- Home
- Dalton Conley
Elsewhere U. S. A.
Elsewhere U. S. A. Read online
ALSO BY DALTON CONLEY
The Pecking Order
After the Bell
The Starting Gate
Wealth and Poverty in America
Honky Being Black, Living in the Red
TO NATALIE,
MY PARTNER HERE, THERE, AND ELSEWHERE
Contents
Preface: A Tale of Three Generations
Introduction: Life Among the Elsewhere Class
From the Protestant Ethic to the Elsewhere Ethic
And You May Find Yourself Behind the Wheel of a Large Automobile: From General Motors to Google
One Plus a Hundred Zeros: Welcome to Your (N)Office
Convestment: The Way We Earn and Spend
Shoot the Moon: Public Life in an Age of Private Markets
From Elsewhere to Nowhere: Crime and Punishment
Polymorphous Perversity: Family Life in the Elsewhere Society
The Birth of the Intravidual
Conclusion: Learning to Love the BlackBerry
Author’s Note
Acknowledgments
Notes
Preface
A TALE OF THREE GENERATIONS
My maternal grandparents were married for more than fifty years. He was the town dentist of Carbondale, Pennsylvania, and she was his homemaker partner. As a professional couple in a mostly'working-class, coal-mining community, they enjoyed a rich social life. They played bridge on the ‘weekends, going so far as to compete in the statewide circuit of tournaments. They also played golf a couple times a week—sharing a drink with their professional friends afterward as they swapped jokes about Jesus and Moses playing the water hole. With some occasional substitutions, they always seemed to tee up with the same couples: another dentist and his wife, a doctor and his wife, and the owner of the local Ford dealership and his wife. None of these college-educated-women worked, though many of them appeared (to me at least) to be a notch or two brighter than their husbands.
As my grandmother put it: Grandpa is in charge of the outside, and I am in charge of the inside. She meant that he took care of mowing the lawn and weeding their vegetable garden, while she was responsible for keeping house and entertaining. But I never thought such an arrangement was quite fair, since I saw the inside to be the 1,200-square-foot house and the outside to stretch to the ends of the known universe. But the system seemed—from outward appearances—to work. Roles and authority were never questioned. And no one ever raised a voice in their home; in fact, still today, if I need to conjure up a calming, peaceful image, I think of sitting in a rocking chair on their porch, talking about my summer plans.
Of course, I remember their lives through the idealized glasses of a child. But there are some basic facts that cannot be disputed. For example, though my grandfather enjoyed his work, he saved and invested his money as best he could so that he could retire early. And retire early he did—by his mid-fifties the only teeth he pulled were those of my sister and me when we went for our annual checkup in his Depression-era basement chair. Work was simply something you did and hopefully enjoyed, but it was something you strove to leave behind as soon as you were financially able to lead “the good life.” For them, the good life entailed paid off mortgages, kids through college, and a condo in Florida where they could spend the winter months and play golf more than twice a week. Perhaps, then, it is fitting (or even ironic) that my grandfather, who lived to a ripe age of eighty-one, died thanks to his favorite leisure activity. While playing golf in Florida in 1989, his friend lost control of the motorized golf cart and ran him over. A few days later, he died of heart failure.
Perhaps the absurdity of the accident sparked my grandmother’s irrepressible humor. But for the fifteen years afterward that she lived on, she would remark that perhaps it was best that he died the way he did. “He always said he wanted to die on a golf course after hitting a hole in one,” she would say, perhaps unaware of the renowned scene from the film Caddyshack, which depicted just that. “He’ll have to settle for par.” The real reason it was all for the best, she’d add in a more serious tone, was that his health was beginning to fail him anyway—and it’s better, she’d argue, to go quickly than to wither away.
My own parents’ marriage represented quite a different arrangement to that of my mother’s folks. My father did the cooking. Both pursued careers that were ends in and of themselves. Earning money was secondary in the 1960s and ’70s. He, an artist, has painted acrylics on canvas long before and long after his day job ended. He soldiers on, forsaking the New York art world, to which he had moved from Connecticut via Wisconsin. Today, he paints daily in a large garage-based studio in rural Pennsylvania, not far from where my mother was raised. She, meanwhile, continues to write books long after her flash of success in the early 1980s has been forgotten and publishers have moved on to the latest hot, young author.
They never learned to play golf or bridge. For them, leisure meant throwing or attending a dinner party with their group of bohemian friends. Or perhaps going to an art opening. Or maybe, if my mother could convince my father, going to a literary reading. But as they got older, mostly their free time meant watching television or reading, for my mother, and exercising or watching sports, for my father. They, of course, don’t have as much free time as my grandparents since they still work at their chosen vocation every day.
As children both my parents were given bikes and free-range of the small towns in which they lived, whereas my sister and I had to learn to navigate the dangerous world of New York City in the 1970s. That meant a lot shorter radius of freedom. It also meant learning the bus, and later, the subway system. And it meant that socializing for us had to be prearranged, often involving sleepovers. In fact, the first time my sister was allowed to go outside and roam the city without an adult was January 22, 1984. She was eleven. This date was forever etched into our consciousness since it was preserved for posterity by the New York Times, in a story the paper ran on the revitalization of lower Broadway. At first my mother thought it must have been a pervert who was bothering her daughter and her friends when Alexandra recounted the story. But the next day, the proof was there in black and white: “Down the block at Tower Records, the midday rush was reaching a crescendo,” wrote John Duka in the Metro Section.
“Lower Broadway is New Wave,” said Alexandra Conley, 11 years old, as she and a group of her friends who live in the neighborhood headed for the back of the store.
“It’s in,” piped Johanna Jackson, 11.
“What’s really good about this neighborhood,” said Jessica Nudel, 11, as she cleared her throat to silence the shuffling of a group of boys who joined them, “what’s really good, is that it used to be all burned out, you know, but now you can be a kid and walk anywhere without being afraid.”
“Gosh, is she smart,” said a boy in a blue parka. At that, Jessica, Johanna and Alexandra all rolled their eyes, jumped up and down like hot popcorn and fell upon the nearest stack of 45’s.
Today, though New York City is way safer than it was in 1984, I could not imagine letting my ten-year-old daughter walk the four blocks to school by herself, let alone hang out in Tower Records (now defunct, the building snapped up by my employer, New York University—but that’s a different, if related story about the transformation of the urban economy). She would hardly have time, anyway. As I write this, she is busy with ice-skating lessons. Yesterday was piano, and the day before was French. This is all piled on top of homework, online math tutorials, and other after-school activities. Not to mention being dragged along to academic lectures, on business trips, and to playdates where the parents want to get to know one another, so they thrust unfamiliar kids (roughly the same age) into a room together as the grown-ups sip coffee. And besides, my chi
ldren’s own friends are much more in flux. Whereas Alexandra is still best friends with the very same Johanna mentioned in the 1984 article, my daughter’s best friend just moved to Tokyo with her mother, who landed a huge promotion there (leaving her brother and father behind in New York—and, no, they are not getting divorced). It may be a crazy arrangement, but it is by no means unique. My own sister’s husband just got relocated to Italy for nine months—not enough time for her to learn the language and start up a new career with two young children, so she is staying in the United States. And my wife’s boss and his spouse split their time between New York, where he works, and Israel, where she does.
Leisure? The “good life”? What are those? Work is the central aspect of our lives. We are lucky that it is fulfilling work— work that we will probably continue to do until we are no longer capable—but it is, unlike that of my parents, all-consuming work. There is always an e-mail to answer, a paper or memo to read, and a lecture to give or receive. Success in today’s professional world doesn’t mean retiring at fifty to play golf in Florida, it means working more and more hours as you move up a towering ladder of economic opportunity (and inequality). Socializing usually revolves around professional colleagues. Not necessarily—or especially—people we actually work with in our own offices. No, most socializing involves weak, work-related ties: folks who are in the same field but just swinging through town for a conference or meeting—potential clients, former mentors, prospective employees. You never know from where the next big project—that great idea—is going to come from in today’s “knowledge economy.”
In our marriage, nobody cooks. We generally eat take-out, when I am in charge, or raw food, when my wife is. Whereas, even in my parents’ relatively progressive marriage, my mother was the primary caregiver (except for Sundays when my father would take us to Aqueduct Racetrack), in our arrangement it is often more likely that I will be the one to pick up the kids thanks to my wife’s more hectic travel schedule. Ours is a constant juggling of iPhone-kept schedules that never quite sync. We try to schedule our commitments so as to always have a free parent to pick up the kids (and in case of emergency). But sometimes it is inevitable that we both have to be away and the decision is whether to make arrangements with my mother or sister to pick them up for a sleepover, or to bring them with us on one or the other of our business trips.
Even when we are both “here” so to speak, we are never quite all here. There’s always some distraction. Our cell phones ring, an “urgent” instant message comes in, or perhaps we are just distracted by the million things on that imaginary “to do” list in our minds. And like most professionals today, we don’t really produce anything all that tangible. Or, at least, we are so far removed from the production process that sometimes our connection to the stuff around us and the economy in general seems a tad abstract. That doesn’t stop us from working, especially when we feel like we are falling behind in relative economic terms—even if, paradoxically, we are faring better than ever in absolute terms.
It’s all enough to drive one bonkers. And sometimes I think that is what’s happening. Not just to me, but to lots of the folks around me. That rocking chair in my grandparents’ house sounds real nice about now. But I can’t seem to find it in this Elsewhere Society in which we live.
Introduction
Life Among the Elsewhere Class
The alarm clock sounds at 7:00 a.m., and Mr. 1959 rolls out of bed, just as members of the American professional class have been doing for the last hundred years. As he pads down the stairs of his 1,500-square-foot home into a modernized kitchen to pour himself a cup of coffee and read the paper, the house is abuzz with his three kids swirling about, swigging gulps of milk and chomping on freshly buttered toast Awhile gathering up their schoolbooks. His wife is the conductor, orchestrating the scene with her spatula as baton. She reminds the kids that she and Mr. 1959 will be out that evening at their bridge club, but they should not take that as an excuse to forget about their homework.
When the kids have left on their bikes to the public school six blocks away, she serves up a stack of hotcakes to her husband, who shares some of the headlines aloud before checking his wristwatch and realizing he’d better get a move on. So he heads back upstairs to shower, shave, and throw on a suit and tie before strolling out to the carport to drive the station wagon into the city where he works. Now Mrs. 1959 can have coffee with the neighbors, spend an hour or so looking through vacation brochures for their upcoming anniversary trip, and head off to a neighborhood association meeting. She’s back to provide snacks by the time the kids arrive home from school.
Meanwhile, at work, Mr. 1959, a newly minted vice president of a tire company, spends the day on the phone with suppliers of the steel belt that goes into the new radials they are producing. There has been a delay in the latest shipment and the company is at risk of a domino effect of wasted work hours and disgruntled wholesalers if he can’t solve the problem; that said, there is little he can do since the only other supplier is in France and the shipping time is too great. Crisis aside, he makes time for a long lunch that includes a couple of drinks. It’s his turn to buy: he and his fellow VP from sales always alternate picking up the tab. This is unspoken and fair since they know that they make the same amount of money given their equivalent ranks in the firm.
The alarm clock sounds again, exactly at 7:00 a.m.—only fifty years later. Mr. 2009, a marketing consultant, zaps the button quickly: he has already been up for half an hour and showered— the alarm is really just a safety net. He zips up his $250 jeans and his favorite faux-vintage polyester sweat jacket, faded T-shirt underneath, and gives himself a glance in the mirror. No need to shave—he only does that every third day, preferring the stubbly look (and it’s easier on his sensitive skin). Besides, he’s just saved himself ten minutes, which he spends scrolling through his BlackBerry to see what messages came in since the last time he checked (at about midnight, a few minutes before he drifted off to sleep, reading material still lying open on his chest).
His wife is probably landing in London now, having taken the red-eye the night before for an afternoon meeting with clients there. She will stay the night in the UK and then fly back the following day. (She offered to come back the same day, but Mr. 2009, feeling magnanimous, said he could handle the kids and that she should take a hotel for the night.) So he heads through the condo, grabbing each of the two kids’ big toes to shake them awake.
“We’ll grab a bagel on the way,” he tells them as they rub sleep from their eyes. In the stainless-steel and granite kitchen, he checks the chart posted on the fridge and adds, “Richard, you have gym today. Wear sneakers. SAT prep at three-thirty and video-making at five. Diane, you’ve got lacrosse and drama.” Richard’s barely listening. He sneaks onto Second Life (the virtual online, multiuser domain) and tells his avatar to message friends to meet up online tonight at eight.
During the long SUV drive to their magnet school, Diane realizes she forgot her lacrosse equipment. There’s no time to go back, so Mr. 2009 says he’ll call one of his interns to run the gear over to her. At the next red light he text-messages the college student to that effect, while his kids chat on their own cell phones. Between dropping them off and reaching his office in the rapidly gentrifying West Thirties, twenty new messages have piled up in his BlackBerry.
He makes a brief appearance at the loftlike office and then heads out to the local Starbucks with his laptop to work on a memo on viral media strategy before his meetings. He finds it hard to concentrate, however, since he can’t stop himself from toggling (alt-tab) over to his open-source Firefox browser to e-trade stocks in his self-managed retirement portfolio and search the real estate listings to see how much his neighbors are listing their apartment for. He has been obsessing about the value of his home lately. Maybe this is related to the fact that he happened to see his college friend’s tax return lying around the week before. He had been surprised that his buddy was pulling in $300K to his ow
n $200—mostly from figures on lines 12 and 13: capital gains and business income. He wonders whether he is falling behind even the other partners at his very own consulting firm.
Sometime around eight in the evening, he and his kids reconvene with their respective laptops at the dining-room banquette that doubles as a meeting table. Japanese food arrives—chicken teriyaki for the kids and sushi for Dad—and Mr. 2009 begins to feel uneasy as the Mexican-born deliveryman peels off his change, dollar by dollar, from the roll of bills he is carrying in the inside pocket of his Windbreaker. He realizes the uneasiness is really guilt. Guilt because this man at his door looks older than the typical delivery person, and for a brief flash he wonders where the man’s own kids might be. Guilt because he feels bad about ogling his partner’s tax return when this guy obviously scrapes by on tips, rain or shine, day in and day out. So he waves off the man’s efforts to hand him his $14 change, telling him it’s the tip. But the minute he closes the door, the moral pendulum swings back and he regrets ruining the tip scale for future deliveries.
While they eat, Mr. 2009 asks his kids about their day. They chat as each of them keeps one eye on a computer or other communication device. Dad wishes he could be totally engaged and interested, but he simply can’t. It’s not just that he is constantly multitasking. It’s not just that his attention span seems to have shrunk. It’s not just that he is more and more worried about work. It’s his kids, too: even if he were totally available, they are not. (It would probably alleviate some of his guilt, though, if he knew that his generation of fathers actually spends more time with their children than any in recent history.)1
These two sketches make it clear that a new breed of American has arrived on the scene. This new type of person is a product of contemporary economic and social conditions just as much as William Whyte’s “Organization Man” was a product of corporate capitalism in the 1950s. However, the social landscape that gave birth to Mr. and Mrs. 2009—a.k.a. Mr. and Mrs. Elsewhere—bears little resemblance to that of the 1950s, even though the latter still serves as America’s common, albeit implicit, reference point. Changes in three areas of our lives— the economy, the family, and technology—have combined to alter the social world and give birth to this new type of American professional. This new breed—the intravidual—has multiple selves competing for attention within his/her own mind, just as, externally, she or he is bombarded by multiple stimuli simultaneously. The necessity of managing these multiple “flows” in a social world where many boundaries have fallen away forms a new ethic for American life. In short, for many of us, intra-vidualism has displaced—or at least competes with—individualism. Whereas in American individualism, the ethical imperative was to first find oneself—that is, one’s authentic inner core— and then to let that authenticity guide our choices in life, intra-vidualism is an ethic of managing the myriad data streams, impulses, desires, and even consciousnesses that we experience in our heads as we navigate multiple worlds.